Suchergebnisse

International audience ; Concepts for sustainable bioeconomy systems are gradually replacing the ones on linear product chains. The reason is that continuously expanding linear chain activities are considered to contribute to climate change, reduced biodiversity, overexploitation of resources, food insecurity, and the double burden of disease. Are sustainable bioeconomy systems a guarantee for a healthy planet? If yes, why, when, and how? In literature, different sustainability indicators have been presented to shed light on this complicated question. Due to high degrees of complexity and interactions of actors in bioeconomy systems, trade-offs and non-linear outcomes became apparent. This fueled the debates about the normative dimensions of the bioeconomy. In particular, the behavior of actors and the utilization of products do not seem to be harmonized according to the environmental, social, and economic pillars of sustainability. Potential conflicts require a new conceptual framework that is here introduced. It consists of a 'sustainability' cylinder captured between an inner-cylinder, representing order, and an outer-cylinder for chaos, based on the laws of physics and complex adaptive systems. Such a framework permits (bioeconomy) systems to propagate in the sustainability zone only if they follow helical pathways serving as the new norms. Helices are a combination of two sinusoidal patterns. The first represents here the sustainable behavior of interacting actors and the second the balanced usage of resources and products. The latter counteracts current growth discourses. The applicability of the conceptual cylinder framework is positively verified via 9 cases in Europe, which encompass social-organizational and product-technological innovations.

International audience ; Concepts for sustainable bioeconomy systems are gradually replacing the ones on linear product chains. The reason is that continuously expanding linear chain activities are considered to contribute to climate change, reduced biodiversity, overexploitation of resources, food insecurity, and the double burden of disease. Are sustainable bioeconomy systems a guarantee for a healthy planet? If yes, why, when, and how? In literature, different sustainability indicators have been presented to shed light on this complicated question. Due to high degrees of complexity and interactions of actors in bioeconomy systems, trade-offs and non-linear outcomes became apparent. This fueled the debates about the normative dimensions of the bioeconomy. In particular, the behavior of actors and the utilization of products do not seem to be harmonized according to the environmental, social, and economic pillars of sustainability. Potential conflicts require a new conceptual framework that is here introduced. It consists of a 'sustainability' cylinder captured between an inner-cylinder, representing order, and an outer-cylinder for chaos, based on the laws of physics and complex adaptive systems. Such a framework permits (bioeconomy) systems to propagate in the sustainability zone only if they follow helical pathways serving as the new norms. Helices are a combination of two sinusoidal patterns. The first represents here the sustainable behavior of interacting actors and the second the balanced usage of resources and products. The latter counteracts current growth discourses. The applicability of the conceptual cylinder framework is positively verified via 9 cases in Europe, which encompass social-organizational and product-technological innovations.

International audience ; Concepts for sustainable bioeconomy systems are gradually replacing the ones on linear product chains. The reason is that continuously expanding linear chain activities are considered to contribute to climate change, reduced biodiversity, overexploitation of resources, food insecurity, and the double burden of disease. Are sustainable bioeconomy systems a guarantee for a healthy planet? If yes, why, when, and how? In literature, different sustainability indicators have been presented to shed light on this complicated question. Due to high degrees of complexity and interactions of actors in bioeconomy systems, trade-offs and non-linear outcomes became apparent. This fueled the debates about the normative dimensions of the bioeconomy. In particular, the behavior of actors and the utilization of products do not seem to be harmonized according to the environmental, social, and economic pillars of sustainability. Potential conflicts require a new conceptual framework that is here introduced. It consists of a 'sustainability' cylinder captured between an inner-cylinder, representing order, and an outer-cylinder for chaos, based on the laws of physics and complex adaptive systems. Such a framework permits (bioeconomy) systems to propagate in the sustainability zone only if they follow helical pathways serving as the new norms. Helices are a combination of two sinusoidal patterns. The first represents here the sustainable behavior of interacting actors and the second the balanced usage of resources and products. The latter counteracts current growth discourses. The applicability of the conceptual cylinder framework is positively verified via 9 cases in Europe, which encompass social-organizational and product-technological innovations.

Circular economy is a recent economic model that aims to reconcile economic growth with the preservation of the environment. It is based on the insight that our natural resources (energy, water, raw material) are limited and that with a population estimated to reach 9 billion people in 2050, the current linear 'take-make-dispose' model is no longer sustainable. Central to circular economy is the closed loop idea, aiming at enhancing the continuous flow of technical and biological materials in the value circle while keeping products, components and materials at their highest utility and value at all times and reducing waste to a minimum (EMF, 2013). The concept of circular economy has received increasing attention among policy makers in the past years. In China, circular economy is part of the national political strategy (top down approach), and its implementation is following both a horizontal and a vertical approach (Feng and Yan, 2007). The European Commission has adopted a new Circular Economy Package in 2014 to support businesses and consumers in their transition to a more circular economy where resources are used in a more sustainable way. In the academic literature, there is not yet a common theoretical framework or definition of what circular economy exactly is. This may be due to the fact that circular economy has emerged from policies and legislation rather than from a group of academics (Murray et al, 2015). Another reason is that the concept has issued from different schools of thought and has diverse theoretical and disciplinary backgrounds such as ecological economics, environmental economics, industrial ecology, performance economy etc. (Ghisellini et al, 2015). The Ellen MacArthur Foundation defines circular economy as "an industrial system that is restorative or regenerative by intention and design" (EMF, 2015). The major challenge of implementing a circular economy is that it requires a change at a system level, not only demanding for adequate policies, but involving all actors within the value ...

Circular economy is a recent economic model that aims to reconcile economic growth with the preservation of the environment. It is based on the insight that our natural resources (energy, water, raw material) are limited and that with a population estimated to reach 9 billion people in 2050, the current linear 'take-make-dispose' model is no longer sustainable. Central to circular economy is the closed loop idea, aiming at enhancing the continuous flow of technical and biological materials in the value circle while keeping products, components and materials at their highest utility and value at all times and reducing waste to a minimum (EMF, 2013). The concept of circular economy has received increasing attention among policy makers in the past years. In China, circular economy is part of the national political strategy (top down approach), and its implementation is following both a horizontal and a vertical approach (Feng and Yan, 2007). The European Commission has adopted a new Circular Economy Package in 2014 to support businesses and consumers in their transition to a more circular economy where resources are used in a more sustainable way. In the academic literature, there is not yet a common theoretical framework or definition of what circular economy exactly is. This may be due to the fact that circular economy has emerged from policies and legislation rather than from a group of academics (Murray et al, 2015). Another reason is that the concept has issued from different schools of thought and has diverse theoretical and disciplinary backgrounds such as ecological economics, environmental economics, industrial ecology, performance economy etc. (Ghisellini et al, 2015). The Ellen MacArthur Foundation defines circular economy as "an industrial system that is restorative or regenerative by intention and design" (EMF, 2015). The major challenge of implementing a circular economy is that it requires a change at a system level, not only demanding for adequate policies, but involving all actors within the value chains (suppliers, manufacturers, retailers, consumers) of diverse economic sectors. At a firm level, new business models are needed that replace existing ones or offer new market opportunities (EMF, 2013). The structure of a business model is usually based on the largely recognised Business Model Canvas (BMC) by Osterwalder and Pigneur (2010). The BMC is a practical tool which can be used as analytical framework for existing or future business models. It consists of nine building blocks where the value proposition - i.e. the value proposed by an enterprise to solve customers' problems and satisfy their needs - is central: (1) the key activities, partners and resources as strategic components, (2) the customer relationships, the customer segments and channels as market components, and (3) the cost structure vs. revenue streams as financial components. Lewandowski (2016) has adapted and extended the BMC to the circular economy principles, adding two more building blocks. First, a 'take-back system', including the idea of material loops where products, components or materials can be reused if collected back from the consumer; and second, the 'adoption factors', assuming that a transition towards circular business models must be supported by various internal organisational capabilities and external (technological, political, sociocultural, economic) factors. Mentink (2014, p.35) defines a circular business model as "the rationale of how an organization creates, delivers and captures value with and within closed material loops". Here, we present the structure of such a novel circular business model from the agri-food sector, the kind of value proposed and the success factors by analysing the case of the enterprise Grap'Sud in the South of France, which valorises waste and by-products from the wine industry. Results show that the structure and persistence of the circular business model depend on internal as well as external factors. From a strategic point of view, adopting innovative technologies for highly value-added products and a sufficient quantity and provision of agro-waste and by-products are crucial. This calls for a strong cooperation with research partners and suppliers as well as for a centralised governance structure and shows that business models within a circular economy should be designed according to territorial capacities to produce and process agro-waste. On the other hand, continuous product innovation combined with a targeted marketing are needed in order to be profitable and competitive on the markets. Finally, public financial support and the legal framework are important external determinants. Hence, translating technology into business while fulfilling environmental and economic goals remains a real challenge for achieving a transition to a circular economy in the agri-food sector.

Circular economy is a recent economic model that aims to reconcile economic growth with the preservation of the environment. It is based on the insight that our natural resources (energy, water, raw material) are limited and that with a population estimated to reach 9 billion people in 2050, the current linear 'take-make-dispose' model is no longer sustainable. Central to circular economy is the closed loop idea, aiming at enhancing the continuous flow of technical and biological materials in the value circle while keeping products, components and materials at their highest utility and value at all times and reducing waste to a minimum (EMF, 2013). The concept of circular economy has received increasing attention among policy makers in the past years. In China, circular economy is part of the national political strategy (top down approach), and its implementation is following both a horizontal and a vertical approach (Feng and Yan, 2007). The European Commission has adopted a new Circular Economy Package in 2014 to support businesses and consumers in their transition to a more circular economy where resources are used in a more sustainable way. In the academic literature, there is not yet a common theoretical framework or definition of what circular economy exactly is. This may be due to the fact that circular economy has emerged from policies and legislation rather than from a group of academics (Murray et al, 2015). Another reason is that the concept has issued from different schools of thought and has diverse theoretical and disciplinary backgrounds such as ecological economics, environmental economics, industrial ecology, performance economy etc. (Ghisellini et al, 2015). The Ellen MacArthur Foundation defines circular economy as "an industrial system that is restorative or regenerative by intention and design" (EMF, 2015). The major challenge of implementing a circular economy is that it requires a change at a system level, not only demanding for adequate policies, but involving all actors within the value chains (suppliers, manufacturers, retailers, consumers) of diverse economic sectors. At a firm level, new business models are needed that replace existing ones or offer new market opportunities (EMF, 2013). The structure of a business model is usually based on the largely recognised Business Model Canvas (BMC) by Osterwalder and Pigneur (2010). The BMC is a practical tool which can be used as analytical framework for existing or future business models. It consists of nine building blocks where the value proposition - i.e. the value proposed by an enterprise to solve customers' problems and satisfy their needs - is central: (1) the key activities, partners and resources as strategic components, (2) the customer relationships, the customer segments and channels as market components, and (3) the cost structure vs. revenue streams as financial components. Lewandowski (2016) has adapted and extended the BMC to the circular economy principles, adding two more building blocks. First, a 'take-back system', including the idea of material loops where products, components or materials can be reused if collected back from the consumer; and second, the 'adoption factors', assuming that a transition towards circular business models must be supported by various internal organisational capabilities and external (technological, political, sociocultural, economic) factors. Mentink (2014, p.35) defines a circular business model as "the rationale of how an organization creates, delivers and captures value with and within closed material loops". Here, we present the structure of such a novel circular business model from the agri-food sector, the kind of value proposed and the success factors by analysing the case of the enterprise Grap'Sud in the South of France, which valorises waste and by-products from the wine industry. Results show that the structure and persistence of the circular business model depend on internal as well as external factors. From a strategic point of view, adopting innovative technologies for highly value-added products and a sufficient quantity and provision of agro-waste and by-products are crucial. This calls for a strong cooperation with research partners and suppliers as well as for a centralised governance structure and shows that business models within a circular economy should be designed according to territorial capacities to produce and process agro-waste. On the other hand, continuous product innovation combined with a targeted marketing are needed in order to be profitable and competitive on the markets. Finally, public financial support and the legal framework are important external determinants. Hence, translating technology into business while fulfilling environmental and economic goals remains a real challenge for achieving a transition to a circular economy in the agri-food sector.

Circular economy is a recent economic model that aims to reconcile economic growth with the preservation of the environment. It is based on the insight that our natural resources (energy, water, raw material) are limited and that with a population estimated to reach 9 billion people in 2050, the current linear 'take-make-dispose' model is no longer sustainable. Central to circular economy is the closed loop idea, aiming at enhancing the continuous flow of technical and biological materials in the value circle while keeping products, components and materials at their highest utility and value at all times and reducing waste to a minimum (EMF, 2013). The concept of circular economy has received increasing attention among policy makers in the past years. In China, circular economy is part of the national political strategy (top down approach), and its implementation is following both a horizontal and a vertical approach (Feng and Yan, 2007). The European Commission has adopted a new Circular Economy Package in 2014 to support businesses and consumers in their transition to a more circular economy where resources are used in a more sustainable way. In the academic literature, there is not yet a common theoretical framework or definition of what circular economy exactly is. This may be due to the fact that circular economy has emerged from policies and legislation rather than from a group of academics (Murray et al, 2015). Another reason is that the concept has issued from different schools of thought and has diverse theoretical and disciplinary backgrounds such as ecological economics, environmental economics, industrial ecology, performance economy etc. (Ghisellini et al, 2015). The Ellen MacArthur Foundation defines circular economy as "an industrial system that is restorative or regenerative by intention and design" (EMF, 2015). The major challenge of implementing a circular economy is that it requires a change at a system level, not only demanding for adequate policies, but involving all actors within the value ...

International audience ; In the European Union, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the food sector have to be sufficiently competitive to face various current challenges, such as changing governmental regulations, competition with large-scale manufacturers, increased pressure of retail, environmental restrictions, etc. Based on the assumption that traditional products and recent innovations could be complementary vectors to boost economic growth, this work seeks to establish a relationship between tradition and innovations from a SME point of view. After an identification of traditional products and innovation from research topics in the durum wheat and Mediterranean vegetable chains, SMEs were interviewed to get insight in their needs and the hurdles they are facing within the entire value chain (at agronomic, technological, product-related, marketing, and organizational levels). Using both qualitative and quantitative questionnaires, results showed that interviewed enterprises appeared as dynamic businesses, willing to innovate and invest, but occasionally facing financing issues. The high-rated topics of interest correspond to quality management, regulations, new products, packaging, and process technology trainings. Potential innovations are compared with the identified SMEs needs revealing a keen interest of interviewed SMEs for recent research innovations (e.g. mixed crops, bio-based and functional packaging, novel preservation processes, ecoconception, etc.). The high values of ratings of training subjects demonstrate the need for an action plan dedicated to SMEs of the traditional food sector such as an online portal, a traditional food-oriented magazine, or a joint technology demonstration platform.

International audience ; In the European Union, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the food sector have to be sufficiently competitive to face various current challenges, such as changing governmental regulations, competition with large-scale manufacturers, increased pressure of retail, environmental restrictions, etc. Based on the assumption that traditional products and recent innovations could be complementary vectors to boost economic growth, this work seeks to establish a relationship between tradition and innovations from a SME point of view. After an identification of traditional products and innovation from research topics in the durum wheat and Mediterranean vegetable chains, SMEs were interviewed to get insight in their needs and the hurdles they are facing within the entire value chain (at agronomic, technological, product-related, marketing, and organizational levels). Using both qualitative and quantitative questionnaires, results showed that interviewed enterprises appeared as dynamic businesses, willing to innovate and invest, but occasionally facing financing issues. The high-rated topics of interest correspond to quality management, regulations, new products, packaging, and process technology trainings. Potential innovations are compared with the identified SMEs needs revealing a keen interest of interviewed SMEs for recent research innovations (e.g. mixed crops, bio-based and functional packaging, novel preservation processes, ecoconception, etc.). The high values of ratings of training subjects demonstrate the need for an action plan dedicated to SMEs of the traditional food sector such as an online portal, a traditional food-oriented magazine, or a joint technology demonstration platform.

International audience ; In the European Union, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the food sector have to be sufficiently competitive to face various current challenges, such as changing governmental regulations, competition with large-scale manufacturers, increased pressure of retail, environmental restrictions, etc. Based on the assumption that traditional products and recent innovations could be complementary vectors to boost economic growth, this work seeks to establish a relationship between tradition and innovations from a SME point of view. After an identification of traditional products and innovation from research topics in the durum wheat and Mediterranean vegetable chains, SMEs were interviewed to get insight in their needs and the hurdles they are facing within the entire value chain (at agronomic, technological, product-related, marketing, and organizational levels). Using both qualitative and quantitative questionnaires, results showed that interviewed enterprises appeared as dynamic businesses, willing to innovate and invest, but occasionally facing financing issues. The high-rated topics of interest correspond to quality management, regulations, new products, packaging, and process technology trainings. Potential innovations are compared with the identified SMEs needs revealing a keen interest of interviewed SMEs for recent research innovations (e.g. mixed crops, bio-based and functional packaging, novel preservation processes, ecoconception, etc.). The high values of ratings of training subjects demonstrate the need for an action plan dedicated to SMEs of the traditional food sector such as an online portal, a traditional food-oriented magazine, or a joint technology demonstration platform.

In the European Union, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the food sector have to be sufficiently competitive to face various current challenges, such as changing governmental regulations, competition with large-scale manufacturers, increased pressure of retail, environmental restrictions, etc. Based on the assumption that traditional products and recent innovations could be complementary vectors to boost economic growth, this work seeks to establish a relationship between tradition and innovations from a SME point of view. After an identification of traditional products and innovation from research topics in the durum wheat and Mediterranean vegetable chains, SMEs were interviewed to get insight in their needs and the hurdles they are facing within the entire value chain (at agronomic, technological, product-related, marketing, and organizational levels). Using both qualitative and quantitative questionnaires, results showed that interviewed enterprises appeared as dynamic businesses, willing to innovate and invest, but occasionally facing financing issues. The high-rated topics of interest correspond to quality management, regulations, new products, packaging, and process technology trainings. Potential innovations are compared with the identified SMEs needs revealing a keen interest of interviewed SMEs for recent research innovations (e.g. mixed crops, bio-based and functional packaging, novel preservation processes, ecoconception, etc.). The high values of ratings of training subjects demonstrate the need for an action plan dedicated to SMEs of the traditional food sector such as an online portal, a traditional food-oriented magazine, or a joint technology demonstration platform.